Wing-Back vs Full-Back
| |

Wing-Back vs Full-Back: Same Position?

Many people are perplexed by the subject matter of our upcoming discussion. In football, there are many roles where the position is the same but the duties are not. To fully comprehend such roles and responsibilities, we must examine them tactically.

Similarly, the wing-back and full-back positions are among the most perplexing positions in football. What are the differences, despite the fact that they operate on the same pitch? What are the parallels? What are their respective responsibilities? What role do they play in the game?

What is a Full-Back?

To fully comprehend the full-back position, we must go back in time to when football was in its infancy. In football, the formation 2-3-5 was initially used, with the two deep-lying defenders referred to as full-backs.

Because of the emergence of center-backs and the passage of time, these deep-lying full-backs were pushed to the wider areas of the pitch in defense.

As the 4-line defense strategy evolved, which is now the most commonly used defensive system in the world, the two wide defenders were dubbed full-backs. Full-back functions and duties have also evolved over time. Here are two examples of how full-backs are and were used.

Wing-Back vs Full-Back: Same Position

Full-Backs in Previous Decades

Originally, full-backs were only used for defensive purposes. Their primary responsibility was to prevent opposing teams from attacking from the wider areas of the pitch and to block crosses. Full-backs were also crucial in containing the opposing teams’ wide and fast-paced attackers.

When full-backs are used solely for defensive purposes, as they were in the 1990s and early 2000s, the defensive system becomes more stable and compact because all of the zones of the pitch are marked, making it difficult for opponents to attack.

Full-Backs in Modern Football

Full-back roles in modern football are slightly different. You may have seen Jordi Alba running up and down the left flank on the Nou Camp pitch; today, full-backs play both offensive and defensive roles. They simply do not stay in defensive positions.

Many teams have used their full-backs as an offensive weapon. They have been crucial in launching wide attacks and delivering crosses to their penalty box attackers.

It’s worth noting that there’s a fine line between modern full-backs and wing-backs. Don’t worry, we’ll go over the wing-backs in depth.

From a historical standpoint, these were the two uses of full-backs. All formations with four defenders at the back have two full-backs. Alphonso Davies, Dani Carvajal, and Jordi Alba are some of the world’s best full-backs.

You can watch these fantastic players play to learn about the practical aspects of their position and responsibilities as full-backs.

What is a Wing-Back?

This brings us to the second position in today’s blog. The wing-back position is a relatively new term, though it can be found in the early twenty-first century.

Few characteristics are required for a wing-back or a full-back to play in these positions. These are speed, cross-field ability, and high technical quality both on and off the ball.

Returning to our topic, a wing-back is a cross between wingers and full-backs. The thing that distinguishes them from full-backs, or more accurately, modern full-backs, is their commitment to attack and reduced defensive responsibilities, as wing-backs are typically used in line-ups with three center-backs.

Wing-Back vs Full-Back: Same Position

As previously stated, wing-backs also perform the duties of wingers, which eliminates the need for wingers in a team and allows for more players to be placed in the midfield, providing depth.

While staying high on the flanks, the wing-backs can also track back to accommodate the three center-backs in defense. As a result, they function as a hybrid of two different flanking positions.

A Wing-Back Means Width

One obvious advantage of using wing-backs is the additional width they provide. Due to the presence of only two center-backs, full-backs must also cover the interior areas of the pitch.

Wing-backs, on the other hand, only stick to the flanks and stay wide. This destabilizes the opposing defense and creates a more attacking threat, while wing-backs provide defensive stability.

Different Examples of a Wing-Back:

  • Brazil won the World Cup in 2002 with Cafu and Roberto Carlos as wing-backs. They were entertaining to watch. When you have time, rewind it.
  • Andy Robertson and Trent-Alexander Arnold of Liverpool are two more examples of excellent wing-backs. They are usually full-backs, but they play an excellent hybrid version of winger plus full-back, making Liverpool extremely dangerous in attack.
  • Sergino Dest, an American teenager, is a rising star on FC Barcelona’s right wing. Despite playing as a right-back, the teenager poses a significant attacking threat to the Blaugranas due to his ability to play in the higher regions of the pitch as a wing-back. He also backtracks whenever a defensive need arises.

These were the few practical examples from modern football that you can notice and analyze easily for a better understanding of the concept we are giving here. After a very thorough explanation of both positions, we assume you’re crystal clear about the concepts we have given, so we can head towards the comparison of both.

Head-to-Head Comparison

  • The primary distinction between the two positions is that the full-back is more committed to defensive duties, whereas the wing-back is more committed to offensive duties.
  • Modern full-backs contribute to the attack in part, while wing-backs contribute to the defense in part.
  • Full-backs are used in a four-line defender system, while wing-backs work with the three center-backs.
  • Full-backs are frequently required to contribute in central areas of the pitch, whereas wing-backs primarily remain on the flanks, providing constant width to the team.
  • Both positions require the occupant to be quick because they must cover a large amount of ground, as well as be technically gifted.

These were the basic comparisons between both positions; you can also consider them a summary of our entire discussion above. All of the concepts discussed above can be found in these comparisons in a very concise form.


That’s all for today; we won’t bother you with any more tactical discussions. Hopefully, you enjoyed reading a detailed discussion about your favorite game. We expect you to understand the primary distinction between a wing-back and a full-back.

And you will no longer be confused by the two positions because they are so dissimilar. It is determined by your game strategy and tactics. We can’t tell anyone that one is better than the other because each has its own set of advantages.


Enter your email to join our community.

Similar Posts