Head to head+ New comparison
vs
Z. Tripić has the better season — 83.6 vs 78.8 season rating.
Tripić on topHead-to-head analysis
Tripić has the better season, a 84 to Qazaishvili's 79 — a 5-point edge on our age-blind form rating. Tripić is posting 6G/14A (1.354/90), against 27G/5A (1.154/90) for Qazaishvili.
On talent/ceiling our Rating favours Tripić (22 to 16).
By market value, Tripić is the pricier asset (2.3 to 0.9). Year-on-year, Qazaishvili (value 0.9, season +408.4% YoY) and Tripić (value 2.3, season +28.6% YoY) — with Qazaishvili on the pitch for 92.4% of available minutes to Tripić's 92.3%.
Ratings
78.8
Season rating
83.6
15.6
Rating (talent + age)
21
0.9
Market value index
2.2
Season stats
30
Appearances
16
27
Goals
6
5
Assists
14
2495
Minutes
1329
Per 90
0.974
Goals / 90
0.406
0.18
Assists / 90
0.948
1.154
Goal contribution / 90
1.354
1.731
Defensive actions / 90
1.49
Context
92.4%
Minutes played %
92.3%
20
Age potential
20