Head to head+ New comparison
vs
Z. Tripić has the better season — 80.9 vs 78.8 season rating.
Too close to callHead-to-head analysis
On current form there's almost nothing between them — Qazaishvili grades 79 this season to Tripić's 80. Qazaishvili brings 27G/5A (1.154/90); Tripić 6G/19A (1.361/90).
On talent/ceiling our Rating favours Tripić (21 to 16).
By market value, Tripić is the pricier asset (2.2 to 0.9). Year-on-year, Qazaishvili (value 0.9, season +408.4% YoY) and Tripić (value 2.2, season +24.5% YoY) — with Qazaishvili on the pitch for 92.4% of available minutes to Tripić's 87.5%.
Ratings
78.8
Season rating
80.9
15.6
Rating (talent + age)
21
0.9
Market value index
2.2
Season stats
30
Appearances
20
27
Goals
6
5
Assists
19
2495
Minutes
1653
Per 90
0.974
Goals / 90
0.327
0.18
Assists / 90
1.034
1.154
Goal contribution / 90
1.361
1.731
Defensive actions / 90
1.307
Context
92.4%
Minutes played %
87.5%
20
Age potential
20