Head to head+ New comparison
vs
Z. Tripić has the better season — 83.6 vs 78.8 season rating.
Too close to callHead-to-head analysis
On current form there's almost nothing between them — Qazaishvili grades 79 this season to Tripić's 81. Qazaishvili brings 27G/5A (1.154/90); Tripić 6G/16A (1.312/90).
On talent/ceiling our Rating favours Tripić (21 to 16).
By market value, Tripić is the pricier asset (2.2 to 0.9). Year-on-year, Qazaishvili (value 0.9, season +408.4% YoY) and Tripić (value 2.2, season +28.6% YoY) — with Qazaishvili on the pitch for 92.4% of available minutes to Tripić's 93.1%.
Ratings
78.8
Season rating
83.6
15.6
Rating (talent + age)
21
0.9
Market value index
2.2
Season stats
30
Appearances
18
27
Goals
6
5
Assists
16
2495
Minutes
1509
Per 90
0.974
Goals / 90
0.358
0.18
Assists / 90
0.954
1.154
Goal contribution / 90
1.312
1.731
Defensive actions / 90
1.431
Context
92.4%
Minutes played %
93.1%
20
Age potential
20