Head to head+ New comparison
vs
Z. Tripić has the better season — 80.9 vs 78.8 season rating.
Qazaishvili on topHead-to-head analysis
Qazaishvili has the better season, a 79 to Tripić's 75 — a 4-point edge on our age-blind form rating. Qazaishvili is posting 27G/5A (1.154/90), against 6G/19A (1.277/90) for Tripić.
On talent/ceiling our Rating favours Tripić (20 to 16).
By market value, Tripić is the pricier asset (2.1 to 0.9). Year-on-year, Qazaishvili (value 0.9, season +408.4% YoY) and Tripić (value 2.1, season +24.5% YoY) — with Qazaishvili on the pitch for 92.4% of available minutes to Tripić's 85.1%.
Ratings
78.8
Season rating
80.9
15.6
Rating (talent + age)
21
0.9
Market value index
2.2
Season stats
30
Appearances
22
27
Goals
6
5
Assists
19
2495
Minutes
1762
Per 90
0.974
Goals / 90
0.306
0.18
Assists / 90
0.97
1.154
Goal contribution / 90
1.277
1.731
Defensive actions / 90
1.226
Context
92.4%
Minutes played %
85.1%
20
Age potential
20