Field Insider
Head to head+ New comparison
Central midfielder · Manchester City
54.7season
vs
Winger · Real Madrid
64.9season

Y. Diomande has the better season — 64.9 vs 54.7 season rating.

Diomande on topHead-to-head analysis

Diomande has the better season, a 6 to O'Reilly's 1 — a 5-point edge on our age-blind form rating. Diomande is posting 0G/1A (0.363/90), against 0G/0A and 1.125 defensive actions/90 for O'Reilly.

Their long-term ceilings are level — Rating 76 (O'Reilly) and 77 (Diomande). At 21 vs 19, Diomande has more road ahead, which lifts his ceiling.

By market value, O'Reilly is the pricier asset (137.5 to 67.7). Year-on-year, O'Reilly (value 137.5, season +0% YoY) and Diomande (value 67.7, season +0% YoY) — with O'Reilly on the pitch for 9.4% of available minutes to Diomande's 14.5%.

Ratings

54.7
Season rating
64.9
97
Rating (talent + age)
96.5
104.8
Market value index
95.5

Season stats

3
Appearances
6
0
Goals
0
0
Assists
1
160
Minutes
248

Per 90

0
Goals / 90
0
0
Assists / 90
0.363
0
Goal contribution / 90
0.363
1.125
Defensive actions / 90
3.266

Context

9.4%
Minutes played %
14.5%
97
Age potential
99