Head to head+ New comparison
vs
Y. Diomande has the better season — 64.9 vs 54.7 season rating.
Diomande on topHead-to-head analysis
Diomande has the better season, a 23 to O'Reilly's 3 — a 20-point edge on our age-blind form rating. Diomande is posting 2G/2A (0.783/90), against 0G/0A and 1.51 defensive actions/90 for O'Reilly.
On talent/ceiling our Rating favours Diomande (85 to 78). At 21 vs 19, Diomande has more road ahead, which lifts his ceiling.
By market value, O'Reilly is the pricier asset (140.2 to 75.2). Year-on-year, O'Reilly (value 140.2, season +0% YoY) and Diomande (value 75.2, season +0% YoY) — with O'Reilly on the pitch for 17.4% of available minutes to Diomande's 26.9%.
Ratings
54.7
Season rating
64.9
97
Rating (talent + age)
96.5
104.8
Market value index
95.5
Season stats
6
Appearances
9
0
Goals
2
0
Assists
2
298
Minutes
460
Per 90
0
Goals / 90
0.391
0
Assists / 90
0.391
0
Goal contribution / 90
0.783
1.51
Defensive actions / 90
2.739
Context
17.4%
Minutes played %
26.9%
97
Age potential
99