Head to head+ New comparison
Nathan has the better season — 62.3 vs 62.2 season rating.
Crama on topHead-to-head analysis
Crama has the better season, a 62 to Nathan's 26 — a 36-point edge on our age-blind form rating. Crama is posting 3G/6A and 3.899 defensive actions/90, against 0G/1A and 3.946 defensive actions/90 for Nathan.
On talent/ceiling our Rating favours Crama (76 to 61).
By market value, Crama is the pricier asset (58.3 to 48.4). Year-on-year, Nathan (value 48.4, season +386.7% YoY) and Crama (value 58.3, season +192% YoY) — with Nathan on the pitch for 42.5% of available minutes to Crama's 99.4%.
Ratings
62.3
Season rating
62.2
63.5
Rating (talent + age)
78.7
49.3
Market value index
47.8
Season stats
13
Appearances
48
0
Goals
3
1
Assists
6
1072
Minutes
4293
Per 90
0
Goals / 90
0.063
0.084
Assists / 90
0.126
0.084
Goal contribution / 90
0.189
3.946
Defensive actions / 90
3.899
Context
42.5%
Minutes played %
99.4%
91
Age potential
91