Head to head+ New comparison
Lamine Yamal has the better season — 71.3 vs 53.1 season rating.
Yamal on topHead-to-head analysis
Yamal has the better season, a 71 to Rogers's 53 — a 18-point edge on our age-blind form rating. Yamal is posting 16G/11A (1.071/90), against 10G/6A (0.438/90) for Rogers.
Their long-term ceilings are level — Rating 98 (Yamal) and 96 (Rogers). At 19 vs 24, Yamal has more road ahead, which lifts his ceiling.
By market value, Rogers is the pricier asset (192.6 to 86.8). Year-on-year, Yamal (value 86.8, season +13.7% YoY) and Rogers (value 192.6, season -7% YoY) — with Yamal on the pitch for 66.3% of available minutes to Rogers's 96.1%.
Ratings
71.3
Season rating
53.1
98.3
Rating (talent + age)
96.3
105
Market value index
115.6
Season stats
28
Appearances
37
16
Goals
10
11
Assists
6
2268
Minutes
3285
Per 90
0.635
Goals / 90
0.274
0.437
Assists / 90
0.164
1.071
Goal contribution / 90
0.438
1.786
Defensive actions / 90
1.589
Context
66.3%
Minutes played %
96.1%
99
Age potential
91