Head to head+ New comparison
Lamine Yamal has the better season — 71.3 vs 53.1 season rating.
Yamal on topHead-to-head analysis
Yamal has the better season, a 64 to Rogers's 32 — a 32-point edge on our age-blind form rating. Yamal is posting 8G/6A (1.7/90), against 4G/1A (0.734/90) for Rogers.
On talent/ceiling our Rating favours Yamal (97 to 84). At 19 vs 24, Yamal has more road ahead, which lifts his ceiling.
By market value, Rogers is the pricier asset (168.8 to 85.3). Year-on-year, Yamal (value 85.3, season +0% YoY) and Rogers (value 168.8, season +0% YoY) — with Yamal on the pitch for 43.3% of available minutes to Rogers's 35.8%.
Ratings
71.3
Season rating
53.1
100
Rating (talent + age)
100
105
Market value index
120.2
Season stats
9
Appearances
7
8
Goals
4
6
Assists
1
741
Minutes
613
Per 90
0.972
Goals / 90
0.587
0.729
Assists / 90
0.147
1.7
Goal contribution / 90
0.734
0.85
Defensive actions / 90
1.762
Context
43.3%
Minutes played %
35.8%
99
Age potential
91