Head to head+ New comparison
Lamine Yamal has the better season — 71.3 vs 53.1 season rating.
Yamal on topHead-to-head analysis
Yamal has the better season, a 56 to Rogers's 30 — a 26-point edge on our age-blind form rating. Yamal is posting 7G/5A (1.61/90), against 4G/1A (0.86/90) for Rogers.
On talent/ceiling our Rating favours Yamal (95 to 82). At 19 vs 24, Yamal has more road ahead, which lifts his ceiling.
By market value, Rogers is the pricier asset (163.6 to 84.2). Year-on-year, Yamal (value 84.2, season +0% YoY) and Rogers (value 163.6, season +0% YoY) — with Yamal on the pitch for 39.2% of available minutes to Rogers's 30.6%.
Ratings
71.3
Season rating
53.1
100
Rating (talent + age)
100
105
Market value index
120.2
Season stats
8
Appearances
6
7
Goals
4
5
Assists
1
671
Minutes
523
Per 90
0.939
Goals / 90
0.688
0.671
Assists / 90
0.172
1.61
Goal contribution / 90
0.86
1.073
Defensive actions / 90
1.549
Context
39.2%
Minutes played %
30.6%
99
Age potential
91