Head to head+ New comparison
J. Kiwior has the better season — 70.7 vs 62.3 season rating.
Kiwior on topHead-to-head analysis
Kiwior has the better season, a 32 to Nathan's 24 — a 8-point edge on our age-blind form rating. Kiwior is posting 1G/1A and 2 defensive actions/90, against 0G/1A and 3.946 defensive actions/90 for Nathan.
On talent/ceiling our Rating favours Nathan (61 to 58). At 26 vs 24, Nathan has more road ahead, which lifts his ceiling.
By market value, Nathan is the pricier asset (48 to 36.8). Year-on-year, Kiwior (value 36.8, season +0% YoY) and Nathan (value 48, season +386.7% YoY) — with Kiwior on the pitch for 47.1% of available minutes to Nathan's 39.7%.
Ratings
70.7
Season rating
62.3
58.8
Rating (talent + age)
63.5
37.4
Market value index
49.3
Season stats
8
Appearances
13
1
Goals
0
1
Assists
1
720
Minutes
1072
Per 90
0.125
Goals / 90
0
0.125
Assists / 90
0.084
0.25
Goal contribution / 90
0.084
2
Defensive actions / 90
3.946
Context
47.1%
Minutes played %
39.7%
80
Age potential
91