Head to head+ New comparison
F. Tănase has the better season — 67.8 vs 65.6 season rating.
Tănase on topHead-to-head analysis
Tănase has the better season, a 68 to Havel's 57 — a 11-point edge on our age-blind form rating. Tănase is posting 16G/9A and 3.063 defensive actions/90, against 13G/3A and 0.818 defensive actions/90 for Havel.
On talent/ceiling our Rating favours Havel (51 to 22). At 23 vs 31, Havel has more road ahead, which lifts his ceiling.
By market value, Havel is the pricier asset (52.5 to 2). Year-on-year, Havel (value 52.5) and Tănase (value 2, season +116.6% YoY) — with Havel on the pitch for 85.6% of available minutes to Tănase's 88.4%.
Ratings
65.6
Season rating
67.8
50.1
Rating (talent + age)
21.7
51.7
Market value index
2
Season stats
30
Appearances
37
13
Goals
16
3
Assists
9
2311
Minutes
3261
Per 90
0.506
Goals / 90
0.442
0.117
Assists / 90
0.248
0.623
Goal contribution / 90
0.69
0.818
Defensive actions / 90
3.063
Context
85.6%
Minutes played %
88.4%
93
Age potential
36