Head to head+ New comparison
E. Le Fée has the better season — 67.9 vs 65.6 season rating.
Havel on topHead-to-head analysis
Havel has the better season, a 57 to Fée's 22 — a 35-point edge on our age-blind form rating. Havel is posting 13G/3A and 0.818 defensive actions/90, against 1G/1A and 2.066 defensive actions/90 for Fée.
On talent/ceiling our Rating favours Fée (68 to 51). At 23 vs 26, Havel has more road ahead, which lifts his ceiling.
By market value, Fée is the pricier asset (136 to 52.5). Year-on-year, Havel (value 52.5) and Fée (value 136, season +0% YoY) — with Havel on the pitch for 85.6% of available minutes to Fée's 35.7%.
Ratings
65.6
Season rating
67.9
50.1
Rating (talent + age)
86.4
51.7
Market value index
135.8
Season stats
30
Appearances
7
13
Goals
1
3
Assists
1
2311
Minutes
610
Per 90
0.506
Goals / 90
0.148
0.117
Assists / 90
0.148
0.623
Goal contribution / 90
0.295
0.818
Defensive actions / 90
2.066
Context
85.6%
Minutes played %
35.7%
93
Age potential
80