Head to head+ New comparison
E. Havel has the better season — 65.6 vs 62.9 season rating.
Too close to callHead-to-head analysis
On current form there's almost nothing between them — Havel grades 57 this season to Yamamoto's 56. Havel brings 13G/3A and 0.818 defensive actions/90; Yamamoto 5G/6A and 3.557 defensive actions/90.
On talent/ceiling our Rating favours Yamamoto (63 to 51).
By market value, Yamamoto is the pricier asset (62.8 to 52.5). Year-on-year, Havel (value 52.5) and Yamamoto (value 62.8, season +387.6% YoY) — with Havel on the pitch for 85.6% of available minutes to Yamamoto's 96.2%.
Ratings
65.6
Season rating
62.9
50.1
Rating (talent + age)
88.6
51.7
Market value index
62.6
Season stats
30
Appearances
38
13
Goals
5
3
Assists
6
2311
Minutes
3289
Per 90
0.506
Goals / 90
0.137
0.117
Assists / 90
0.164
0.623
Goal contribution / 90
0.301
0.818
Defensive actions / 90
3.557
Context
85.6%
Minutes played %
96.2%
93
Age potential
91