Yamal has the better season, a 91 to Rogers's 52 — a 39-point edge on our age-blind form rating. Yamal is posting 16G/11A (1.071/90), against 10G/6A (0.438/90) for Rogers.

Their long-term ceilings are level — Rating 100 (Yamal) and 100 (Rogers). At 19 vs 23, Yamal has more road ahead, which lifts his ceiling.

By market value, Rogers is the pricier asset (202.2 to 152.8). Year-on-year, Yamal (value 152.8, season +48.9% YoY) and Rogers (value 202.2, season -7% YoY) — with Yamal on the pitch for 86.9% of available minutes to Rogers's 96.1%.