Head to head+ New comparison
M. Godts has the better season — 80.3 vs 71.3 season rating.
Godts on topHead-to-head analysis
Godts has the better season, a 80 to Yamal's 71 — a 9-point edge on our age-blind form rating. Godts is posting 17G/13A (0.932/90), against 16G/11A (1.071/90) for Yamal.
On talent/ceiling our Rating favours Yamal (98 to 84). At 19 vs 21, Yamal has more road ahead, which lifts his ceiling.
By market value, Yamal is the pricier asset (86.8 to 57.9). Year-on-year, Yamal (value 86.8, season +13.7% YoY) and Godts (value 57.9, season +236% YoY) — with Yamal on the pitch for 66.3% of available minutes to Godts's 89.4%.
Ratings
71.3
Season rating
80.3
98.3
Rating (talent + age)
83.7
105
Market value index
55.5
Season stats
28
Appearances
34
16
Goals
17
11
Assists
13
2268
Minutes
2896
Per 90
0.635
Goals / 90
0.528
0.437
Assists / 90
0.404
1.071
Goal contribution / 90
0.932
1.786
Defensive actions / 90
1.523
Context
66.3%
Minutes played %
89.4%
99
Age potential
97