Timber has the better season, a 82 to Johnson's 0 — a 82-point edge on our age-blind form rating. Timber is posting 3G/5A and 3.516 defensive actions/90, against 0G/1A and 1 defensive actions/90 for Johnson.

On talent/ceiling our Rating favours Timber (97 to 29). At 25 vs 21, Johnson has more road ahead, which lifts his ceiling.

By market value, Timber is the pricier asset (194.6 to 4.6). Year-on-year, Timber (value 194.6, season +99% YoY) and Johnson (value 4.6) — with Timber on the pitch for 88.1% of available minutes to Johnson's 4.3%.