Field Insider
Head to head+ New comparison
Centre-forward · Bayern München
100season
vs
Centre-forward · Flamengo
83.3season

H. Kane has the better season — 100 vs 83.3 season rating.

Kane on topHead-to-head analysis

Kane has the better season, a 100 to Pedro's 84 — a 16-point edge on our age-blind form rating. Kane is posting 36G/5A (1.549/90), against 15G/4A (0.908/90) for Pedro.

On talent/ceiling our Rating favours Pedro (56 to 38). At 33 vs 29, Pedro has more road ahead, which lifts his ceiling.

By market value, Pedro is the pricier asset (24.5 to 13.3). Year-on-year, Kane (value 13.3, season +3.3% YoY) and Pedro (value 24.5, season +104.7% YoY) — with Kane on the pitch for 82.7% of available minutes to Pedro's 91%.

Ratings

100
Season rating
83.3
36.9
Rating (talent + age)
56.2
12.9
Market value index
24.5

Season stats

31
Appearances
23
36
Goals
15
5
Assists
4
2382
Minutes
1883

Per 90

1.36
Goals / 90
0.717
0.189
Assists / 90
0.191
1.549
Goal contribution / 90
0.908
1.247
Defensive actions / 90
1.147

Context

82.7%
Minutes played %
91%
20
Age potential
53