Field Insider
Head to head+ New comparison
Centre-forward · Manchester City
98.3season
vs
Centre-forward · Bayern München
100season

H. Kane has the better season — 100 vs 98.3 season rating.

Too close to callHead-to-head analysis

On current form there's almost nothing between them — Haaland grades 98 this season to Kane's 100. Haaland brings 27G/8A (1.065/90); Kane 36G/5A (1.549/90).

On talent/ceiling our Rating favours Haaland (92 to 37). At 26 vs 33, Haaland has more road ahead, which lifts his ceiling.

By market value, Haaland is the pricier asset (184.4 to 12.9). Year-on-year, Haaland (value 184.4, season +26.3% YoY) and Kane (value 12.9, season +3.3% YoY) — with Haaland on the pitch for 86.5% of available minutes to Kane's 77.8%.

Ratings

98.3
Season rating
100
92.2
Rating (talent + age)
36.9
184.4
Market value index
12.9

Season stats

35
Appearances
31
27
Goals
36
8
Assists
5
2958
Minutes
2382

Per 90

0.822
Goals / 90
1.36
0.243
Assists / 90
0.189
1.065
Goal contribution / 90
1.549
0.639
Defensive actions / 90
1.247

Context

86.5%
Minutes played %
77.8%
80
Age potential
20