Field Insider
Head to head+ New comparison
Full-back · FC Porto
71.2season
vs
Full-back · Bodo/Glimt
77.5season

F. Sjøvold has the better season — 77.5 vs 71.2 season rating.

Sjøvold on topHead-to-head analysis

Sjøvold has the better season, a 78 to Baio's 71 — a 7-point edge on our age-blind form rating. Sjøvold is posting 3G/2A and 3.801 defensive actions/90, against 1G/8A and 3.953 defensive actions/90 for Baio.

On talent/ceiling our Rating favours Baio (71 to 53).

By market value, Baio is the pricier asset (42.7 to 15). Year-on-year, Baio (value 42.7, season +321.3% YoY) and Sjøvold (value 15, season +59.8% YoY) — with Baio on the pitch for 72.9% of available minutes to Sjøvold's 95.9%.

Ratings

71.2
Season rating
77.5
70.7
Rating (talent + age)
52.6
42.7
Market value index
15

Season stats

29
Appearances
17
1
Goals
3
8
Assists
2
2231
Minutes
1468

Per 90

0.04
Goals / 90
0.184
0.323
Assists / 90
0.123
0.363
Goal contribution / 90
0.307
3.953
Defensive actions / 90
3.801

Context

72.9%
Minutes played %
95.9%
95
Age potential
95