Haaland has the better season, a 98 to Rogers's 53 — a 45-point edge on our age-blind form rating. Haaland is posting 27G/8A (1.065/90), against 10G/6A (0.438/90) for Rogers.

Their long-term ceilings are level — Rating 99 (Haaland) and 100 (Rogers). At 25 vs 23, Rogers has more road ahead, which lifts his ceiling.

By market value, Rogers is the pricier asset (202.2 to 197.4). Year-on-year, Haaland (value 197.4, season +26.3% YoY) and Rogers (value 202.2, season -7% YoY) — with Haaland on the pitch for 86.5% of available minutes to Rogers's 96.1%.