Head to head+ New comparison
E. Le Fée has the better season — 67.9 vs 67.8 season rating.
Too close to callHead-to-head analysis
On current form there's almost nothing between them — Fée grades 68 this season to Tănase's 68. Fée brings 5G/6A and 3.962 defensive actions/90; Tănase 16G/9A and 3.063 defensive actions/90.
On talent/ceiling our Rating favours Fée (86 to 22). At 26 vs 31, Fée has more road ahead, which lifts his ceiling.
By market value, Fée is the pricier asset (172.8 to 2). Year-on-year, Fée (value 172.8, season +251.8% YoY) and Tănase (value 2, season +116.6% YoY) — with Fée on the pitch for 86.3% of available minutes to Tănase's 88.4%.
Ratings
67.9
Season rating
67.8
86.4
Rating (talent + age)
21.7
135.8
Market value index
2
Season stats
36
Appearances
37
5
Goals
16
6
Assists
9
2953
Minutes
3261
Per 90
0.152
Goals / 90
0.442
0.183
Assists / 90
0.248
0.335
Goal contribution / 90
0.69
3.962
Defensive actions / 90
3.063
Context
86.3%
Minutes played %
88.4%
80
Age potential
36