Field Insider
Head to head+ New comparison
Defensive midfielder · BK Hacken
55.2season
vs
Defensive midfielder · Shanghai Shenhua
58.6season

Wu Xi has the better season — 58.6 vs 55.2 season rating.

Xi on topHead-to-head analysis

Xi has the better season, a 59 to Doumbia's 49 — a 10-point edge on our age-blind form rating. Xi is posting 9G/5A and 3.093 defensive actions/90, against 2G/1A and 6.76 defensive actions/90 for Doumbia.

On talent/ceiling our Rating favours Doumbia (43 to 11). At 18 vs 37, Doumbia has more road ahead, which lifts his ceiling.

By market value, Doumbia is the pricier asset (6.9 to 0.4). Year-on-year, Doumbia (value 6.9) and Xi (value 0.4) — with Doumbia on the pitch for 79.4% of available minutes to Xi's 89.4%.

Ratings

55.2
Season rating
58.6
45.2
Rating (talent + age)
10.7
7.3
Market value index
0.4

Season stats

16
Appearances
28
2
Goals
9
1
Assists
5
1358
Minutes
2415

Per 90

0.133
Goals / 90
0.335
0.066
Assists / 90
0.186
0.199
Goal contribution / 90
0.522
6.76
Defensive actions / 90
3.093

Context

79.4%
Minutes played %
89.4%
100
Age potential
5