Head to head+ New comparison
vs
Wu Xi has the better season — 58.6 vs 55.2 season rating.
Xi on topHead-to-head analysis
Xi has the better season, a 59 to Doumbia's 49 — a 10-point edge on our age-blind form rating. Xi is posting 9G/5A and 3.093 defensive actions/90, against 2G/1A and 6.76 defensive actions/90 for Doumbia.
On talent/ceiling our Rating favours Doumbia (43 to 11). At 18 vs 37, Doumbia has more road ahead, which lifts his ceiling.
By market value, Doumbia is the pricier asset (6.9 to 0.4). Year-on-year, Doumbia (value 6.9) and Xi (value 0.4) — with Doumbia on the pitch for 79.4% of available minutes to Xi's 89.4%.
Ratings
55.2
Season rating
58.6
45.2
Rating (talent + age)
10.7
7.3
Market value index
0.4
Season stats
16
Appearances
28
2
Goals
9
1
Assists
5
1358
Minutes
2415
Per 90
0.133
Goals / 90
0.335
0.066
Assists / 90
0.186
0.199
Goal contribution / 90
0.522
6.76
Defensive actions / 90
3.093
Context
79.4%
Minutes played %
89.4%
100
Age potential
5

